Portraits
and Single-image allegories were my main genres of
painting since my teens. I love these traditions and
try to continue them and prove that they are still
valid forms.
Sometimes it's of course hard to tell whether a
painting should be called an allegory or a portrait,
because many portraits — and landscapes and still life
paintings too — have allegorical elements in them too.
My simple solution to this is that the paintings that
I've painted from model, paintings and drawings that
are based on direct observation of a real person or
scene are first and foremost portraits. And the
paintings that depict imaginary scenes are allegories.
Still, sometimes these categories overlap quite a bit,
since occasionally I've added imaginary elements into
pictures that started out as purely observational.
During my career I've grown
steadfastly interested in continuing with these "old
forms". One reaseon was that I noticed that those who
were interested for example in my theatre work, films
and photographic work were often categorically
dismissive of painting as a genre. This irritated me
and actually encouraged me to consciously acknowledge
and show my roots in the tradition that runs from Giotto
(1267–1337) via Giovanni Bellini (1426–1516), Matthias
Grünewald (1475–1528) via Francis
Goya (1746–1828), Otto
Dix (1891–1969), Max
Beckmann (1884–1950), Keith
Haring (1958–1990), A.R.
Penck (1939–), Martin
Kippenberger (1953–1997),
Adolf
Wölfli (1864–1930), Ernst
Ludwig Kirchner (1880–1938), Hilma af
Klint (1962–1944), Maria Lassnig
(1919–2014), Chris
Hipkiss (1964–) and Lena Cronqvist
(1938–).
I've also tried to show that figures like Henri
Matisse (1869–1953) were not just
pre-formalists and ancestors of abstract art, but
simultaneously also exponents of allegorical painting,
painting that deals with the questions of everyday
world instead of turning its back to it in favour of
aesthetic make-believe.
|